Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Am J Transplant ; 24(3): 362-379, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37871799

RESUMO

The Banff pancreas working schema for diagnosis and grading of rejection is widely used for treatment guidance and risk stratification in centers that perform pancreas allograft biopsies. Since the last update, various studies have provided additional insight regarding the application of the schema and enhanced our understanding of additional clinicopathologic entities. This update aims to clarify terminology and lesion description for T cell-mediated and antibody-mediated allograft rejections, in both active and chronic forms. In addition, morphologic and immunohistochemical tools are described to help distinguish rejection from nonrejection pathologies. For the first time, a clinicopathologic approach to islet pathology in the early and late posttransplant periods is discussed. This update also includes a discussion and recommendations on the utilization of endoscopic duodenal donor cuff biopsies as surrogates for pancreas biopsies in various clinical settings. Finally, an analysis and recommendations on the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA for monitoring pancreas graft recipients are provided. This multidisciplinary effort assesses the current role of pancreas allograft biopsies and offers practical guidelines that can be helpful to pancreas transplant practitioners as well as experienced pathologists and pathologists in training.


Assuntos
Transplante de Pâncreas , Transplante Homólogo , Biópsia , Isoanticorpos , Linfócitos T
2.
Transplantation ; 100(6): 1322-8, 2016 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27203593

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Living donor segmental pancreas transplants (LDSPTx) have been performed selectively to offer a preemptive transplant option for simultaneous pancreas-kidney recipients and to perform a single operation decreasing the cost of pancreas after kidney transplant. For solitary pancreas transplants, this option historically provided a better immunologic match. Although short-term donor outcomes have been documented, there are no long-term studies. METHODS: We studied postdonation outcomes in 46 segmental pancreas living donors. Surgical complications, risk factors (RF) for development of diabetes mellitus (DM) and quality of life were studied. A risk stratification model (RSM) for DM was created using predonation and postdonation RFs. Recipient outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Between January 1, 1994 and May 1, 2013, 46 LDSPTx were performed. Intraoperatively, 5 (11%) donors received transfusion. Overall, 9 (20%) donors underwent splenectomy. Postoperative complications included: 6 (13%) peripancreatic fluid collections and 2 (4%) pancreatitis episodes. Postdonation, DM requiring oral hypoglycemics was diagnosed in 7 (15%) donors and insulin-dependent DM in 5 (11%) donors. RSM with three predonation RFs (oral glucose tolerance test, basal insulin, fasting plasma glucose) and 1 postdonation RF, greater than 15% increase in body mass index from preoperative (Δ body mass index >15), predicted 12 (100%) donors that developed postdonation DM. Quality of life was not significantly affected by donation. Mean graft survival was 9.5 (±4.4) years from donors without and 9.6 (±5.4) years from donors with postdonation DM. CONCLUSIONS: LDSPTx can be performed with good recipient outcomes. The donation is associated with donor morbidity including impaired glucose control. Donor morbidity can be minimized by using RSM and predonation counseling on life style modifications postdonation.


Assuntos
Doadores Vivos , Transplante de Pâncreas/métodos , Pâncreas/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Transfusão de Sangue , Complicações do Diabetes/cirurgia , Feminino , Teste de Tolerância a Glucose , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Transplante de Rim/economia , Transplante de Rim/métodos , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Minnesota , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Transplante de Pâncreas/economia , Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Risco , Esplenectomia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
3.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 58(6): 971-80, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21930332

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a major complication of kidney transplant. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study comparing PTLD incidence rates using US Medicare claims and Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) data, examining risk factors for PTLD in OPTN data, and studying recipient and graft survival after PTLD diagnosis. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: All adult first-transplant patients who underwent deceased or living donor kidney-only transplants in 2000-2006 (n = 89,485) followed up through 3 years posttransplant. PREDICTORS: Recipient and donor characteristics, HLA mismatches, viral serologic test results, and initial immunosuppression. OUTCOMES: OPTN-reported or Medicare claims-based PTLD diagnosis, recipient and graft survival after OPTN-reported PTLD diagnosis. MEASUREMENTS: Adjusted HRs for PTLD diagnosis estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model; probability of survival free of all-cause graft failure estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The incidence rate of PTLD during the first posttransplant year was 2-fold higher in Medicare claims (0.46/100 patient-years; 95% CI, 0.39-0.53) than in OPTN data (0.22/100 patient-years; 95% CI, 0.17-0.27). Factors associated with increased rates of PTLD included older age, white race (vs African American), induction with T-cell-depleting antibodies, Epstein-Barr virus seronegativity at the time of transplant, and cytomegalovirus seronegativity at the time of transplant. The adjusted risk of death with graft function was 17.5 (95% CI, 14.3-21.4) times higher after a report of PTLD, and the risk of death-censored graft failure was 5.5 (95% CI, 3.9-7.7) times higher. LIMITATIONS: Shortcomings inherent in large databases, including inconsistencies in patient follow-up, reporting, and coding practices by transplant centers; insufficient registry data to analyze acute rejection episodes and antirejection treatment; no available data for potential effects of different types of PTLD treatment on patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limitations of data collected by registries, PTLD clearly is an important complication; both mortality and death-censored graft failure increase after PTLD.


Assuntos
Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/epidemiologia , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Incidência , Transplante de Rim/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA